Objective: To study the pattern visual evoked potential (P-VEP) in the diag
nosis of functional visual loss.
Study Design: Retrospective study of observational case series.
Participants: Seventy-two subjects whose best corrected visual acuity (VA)
was 20/50 or worse, with or without visual field defect, and whose visual a
bnormalities could not be explained by the findings of ophthalmologic and n
eurologic examination were included in this study.
Main Outcome Measures: To compare the P-VEP estimated acuity to the initial
subjective VA and to the best-performed VA.
Results: Seventy-two subjects with functional visual loss had normal P-VEPs
. The initial subjective VA was 20/50 in 9 subjects and less than or equal
to 20/200 in 42 subjects. After clinical examination and reassurance, the b
est-performed VA was greater than or equal to 20/50 in 53 subjects and less
than or equal to 20/200 in 8 subjects. The discrepancy between the P-VEP e
stimated acuity and the best-performed VA was less than 3 lines of Snellen
acuity in 63 of 72 (87.5%) subjects and more than 4 lines in 6 subjects. Th
ese six subjects were three women with loss of vision of unknown origin and
three men with injury-related visual loss.
Conclusions: P-VEP has the advantage of objectively predicting VA and is a
useful test in the diagnosis of functional visual loss. Ophthalmology 2001;
108:76-81 (C) 2001 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.