Objective: To report the first case of gaze-evoked amaurosis secondary to a
n intraocular foreign body and to highlight the characteristic clinical fin
dings of patients with this symptom.
Design: Case report and review of the literature.
Methods: Case review, clinical history electrophysiologic testing, and foll
ow-up.
Main Outcome Measures: Visual acuity, automated perimetry, and visual field
s.
Results: A case of gaze-evoked amaurosis as a result of an intraorbital for
eign body is described, and 19 additional cases of gaze-evoked amaurosis ar
e reviewed from the English language literature. These cases share certain
characteristics including good vision in primary position with deterioratio
n of vision in eccentric gaze; concurrent objective pupillary abnormalities
in eccentric gaze; stereotypic onset and recovery of vision; and funduscop
ic abnormalities consisting of disc edema and chorioretinal folds.
Conclusions: Gaze-evoked amaurosis is a reliable sign of intraconal mass le
sion. We report the first case of gaze-evoked amaurosis secondary to an int
raorbital foreign body. Ophthalmology 2001;108:201-206 (C) 2001 by the Amer
ican Academy of Ophthalmology.