Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether experience impr
oves detection of small eye movements similar to those seen in the cover te
st during ideal conditions. Methods: Three groups of examiners with varying
amounts of experience in eye movement detection tasks were studied. Eight
examiners were 1st-year optometry students, six were 4th-year optometry stu
dents, and six were practicing optometrists. To determine thresholds for ey
e movement detection, examiners indicated the horizontal direction in which
the eyes of one of the experimenters moved. The direction and extent of ea
ch eye movement was randomly selected. The extent of the eye movement was o
ne of Right logarithmic steps from a maximum that was determined through an
initial session where the approximate sensitivity of the examiners was fou
nd (generally +/- 1.75 prism diopters). Results: Detection thresholds were
determined by fitting the data with a cumulative Gaussian function. The mea
n horizontal eye movement eye movement necessary to obtain 99% correct judg
ments was 2.65 prism diopters for the 1st-year students, 2.47 prism diopter
s for the 4th-year students, and 2.40 prism diopters for the practicing opt
ometrists, Conclusions: The results indicate that during ideal conditions,
little or no training is required for efficient detection of small eye move
ments. (Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:670-674).