Identification of women with reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using BMD at the os calcis

Citation
Jn. Fordham et al., Identification of women with reduced bone density at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using BMD at the os calcis, OSTEOPOR IN, 11(9), 2000, pp. 797-802
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0937941X → ACNP
Volume
11
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
797 - 802
Database
ISI
SICI code
0937-941X(2000)11:9<797:IOWWRB>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
We assessed the clinical usefulness of bone density measurements at the os calcis as a screening tool to identify patients with low bone density at th e lumbar spine and femoral neck. Bone mineral density (BMD) was recorded in 443 women (mean age 60 years) referred to a bone densitometry service. Mea surements were made at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using a Lunar DPXL and at the right os calcis using a Peripheral Instantaneous X-ray Imaging (PIXI) dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry system. Average T-scores derived us ing the manufacturer's data were: 1.59 for the lumbar spine, - 1.41 for the femoral neck and - 0.87 for the os calcis. The prevalence of osteoporosis using WHO criteria (T-scores of -2.5 or less) was 36% for the lumbar spine or femoral neck but only 9.7% for the os calcis. BMD of the os calcis corre lated with that at the lumbar spine (r = 0.69. p<0.001) and femoral neck (r = 0.67, p<0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristics cur ve was 0.836 (standard error 0.020) for the os calcis related to osteoporos is at the lumbar spine or femoral neck. Optimal accuracy was obtained at a T-score of less than or equal to -1.3 (BMD 0.39 g/cm(2)) when the sensitivi ty was 69.6% (95% confidence interval 65.3, 73.9%) and specificity 82.6% (9 5% confidence interval 79.1, 86.1%). However, the probability of diagnosing low bone density from a given BMD at the os calcis varied by age and site scanned. Accordingly, for informing management strategies, the choice of a single cutoff BMD at the os calcis may not be appropriate and several thres holds may be adopted based on age, the site of interest (lumbar spine or fe moral neck) and consideration of associated clinical features. Thus, the us e of heel bone density scanners could reduce the number of axial bone densi ty measurements required. The advantages of portability, low cost and short er scan times should reduce the cost of detection and provide a greater opp ortunity for identification of women at risk of fracture.