The consequence of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance

Citation
Be. Wampold et Rc. Serlin, The consequence of ignoring a nested factor on measures of effect size in analysis of variance, PSYCHOL MET, 5(4), 2000, pp. 425-433
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS
ISSN journal
1082989X → ACNP
Volume
5
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
425 - 433
Database
ISI
SICI code
1082-989X(200012)5:4<425:TCOIAN>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Although the consequences of ignoring a nested factor on decisions to rejec t the null hypothesis of no treatment effects have been discussed in the li terature, typically researchers in applied psychology and education ignore treatment providers (often a nested factor) when comparing the efficacy of treatments. The incorrect analysis, however, not only invalidates tests of hypotheses, but it also overestimates the treatment effect. Formulas were d erived and a Monte Carlo study was conducted to estimate the degree to whic h the F statistic and treatment effect size measures are inflated by ignori ng the effects due to providers of treatments. These untoward effects are i llustrated with examples From psychotherapeutic treatments.