The Stouffer z method, and other popular methods for combining p values fro
m independent significance tests, suffer from three problems: vulnerability
to criticisms of the individual studies being pooled, difficulty in handli
ng the "file drawer problem," and vague conclusions. These problems can be
reduced or eliminated by supplementing a test of combined probability with
a variety of new analyses described here. Along with other advantages, thes
e analyses provide a way to address the file drawer problem without malting
limiting assumptions about the nature of studies not included in the poole
d analysis. These analyses can supplement a traditional meta-analysis, yiel
ding conclusions not provided by widely used metaanalytic procedures.