Jk. Rowlett, A labor-supply analysis of cocaine self-administration under progressive-ratio schedules: antecedents, methodologies, and perspectives, PSYCHOPHAR, 153(1), 2000, pp. 1-16
Rationale: Under a progressive-ratio (PR) schedule, a subject must complete
increasing fixed-ratio (FR) response requirements to obtain reinforcers. R
esponse requirements are increased until responding stops; the final ratio
completed being the "break point" and providing an index of the relative ef
fectiveness, or value, of the reinforcer to maintain behavior. Objectives:
This review examines the historical and conceptual framework underlying the
PR procedure and examines the concept of relative reinforcer value. Pharma
cological analysis (based on receptor theory), and behavior analysis (based
on microeconomic theory) are reviewed. Methods: Using a microeconomic adap
tation of the reinforcement model referred to as conservation, a mathematic
al model of PR performance is proposed based on the curvilinear relationshi
p between economic supply and labor. Drug consumption and instrumental resp
onding were assumed to reflect deviations from a balance point, defined as
the levels of consumption and responding under no scheduled restraint. Data
sets were re-analyzed in which several response sequences were examined in
rhesus monkeys maintained on PR schedules of intravenous cocaine delivery.
Results: The modified conservation equation fitted the PR data accurately,
and results consistent with both linear and concave labor-supply functions
were obtained. These results suggest that cocaine self-administration unde
r PR schedules conforms to labor-supply relationships characterized as inel
astic (consumption is resistant to increases in schedule requirements) and
unit elastic (at high response costs, consumption declines with no correspo
nding increase or decrease in total responding). Conclusions: The labor-sup
ply methodology allows for a definition of the relative value of a drug rei
nforcer in PR studies based on changes in consumption across response costs
. Specifically, relative reinforcer value is defined in terms of changes in
behavior from a balance point, rather than as a property that determines t
he strength of the instrumental response.