Experimental validation of a structure-activity relationship model of skinirritation by esters

Citation
Js. Smith et al., Experimental validation of a structure-activity relationship model of skinirritation by esters, QSAR, 19(5), 2000, pp. 467-474
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry & Analysis
Journal title
QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS
ISSN journal
09318771 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
467 - 474
Database
ISI
SICI code
0931-8771(200012)19:5<467:EVOASR>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
SAR model development should be a continuous process involving formulation then experimental testing of the model, incorporation of test results into the database, then refinement of the model using the expanded database. The larger database affords greater confidence in its ability to predict the b iological response. This iterative procedure was employed with a recently d eveloped structure-activity relationship (SAR) model of human skin irritati on. Based on a ''leave-one-out'' cross validation, the mean sensitivity of the initial model was 0.89, the mean specificity was 0.74. A clinical valid ation study was conducted to assess the ability of the model to predict hum an skin irritation by esters commonly used as fragrance ingredients. Esters that were found to cause irritation in rabbits, and that were within the p redictive space of the SAR model, were selected for human testing using the patch test procedure. Of the 34 rabbit irritants selected, 16 were predict ed by the model to be positive and is were predicted to be negative. Patch testing yielded two positive esters, allyl heptanoate and allyl cyclohexane propionate. These test results were incorporated into the database to refin e the SAR model. Best subsets regression and linear discriminant analysis w ere used to generate 10 submodels consisting of 10 irritants and 50 non-irr itants randomly selected from the new database. Physicochemical parameters associated with irritant esters, when compared with non-irritant esters, di ffered somewhat from those identified in the original model. Irritant ester s had lower solubility parameter and water solubility, higher Hansen disper sion and Hansen hydrogen bonding, and lower sum of partial positive charges , when compared with non-irritant esters. The sensitivity of the new model is 0.69 and specificity is 0.67. The results of this study indicate that SA R models based on limited data may not accurately predict the activity of u nknown chemicals even though the computationally-derived sensitivity and sp ecificity of the models are high. This finding emphasizes the need for expe rimental validation of models and their refinement as new data become avail able.