Quantification of fluid flow in a model and in the cerebral aqueduct in volunteers investigated by MRI

Citation
G. Brinkmann et al., Quantification of fluid flow in a model and in the cerebral aqueduct in volunteers investigated by MRI, ROFO-F RONT, 172(12), 2000, pp. 1043-1051
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
ISSN journal
14389029 → ACNP
Volume
172
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1043 - 1051
Database
ISI
SICI code
1438-9029(200012)172:12<1043:QOFFIA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Purpose: To study the feasability o MRI for quantification of fluid flow in a tube model and the cerebral aqueduct (CA) in volunteers. Volunteers and Methods: All studies were performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner using a head coil and a FLASH 2D phase contrast sequence with a velocity encoding at 20 cm/s . Flow (real value, ml/sec) of a saline fluid was measured in a flexible tu be model with different inside diameters: 0.75-3 mm. Three flow velocities were given (normal value). To test the reproducibility, three studies were done using a flow of 0.12 or 0.14 ml/sec and a tube diameter of 0.75 and 2. 0 mm. The ratio of normal to real flow value was calculated (ideal ratio = 1). MRI of CA and flow quantification was done in 24 volunteers (28+/-4 yea rs). Results: Using tubes with a diameter of 0.75 and 1.5 mm the real flow was sometimes higher than the velocity encoding of the phase contrast seque nces. Because of this measurements of the fluid flow and the flow velocitie s were impossible. There was agreement for fluid flow quantification in the tube of 3.0 mm and high agreement in the tube of 2.0 mm in diameter with r eproducible results. The mean diameter of the CA in normal subjects was 2.0 +/-0.3 mm, the mean cerebral how was 0.04+/-0.02 ml/sec and the peak veloci ty 3.06+/-1.59 cm/sec. Conclusions: Reliable flow quantification with MRI i s feasible if the diameter of the lumen is greater than 1.5 mm, and if the flow velocity is lower than the velocity encoding. In cases of smaller diam eters and higher flow velocities the velocity encoding has to be changed. B ecause of this the quantification seems to be inaccurate in cases of aquedu ctal stenosis with the method we used.