S. Obenauer et al., Full-field digital mammography: Dose-dependent detectability of simulated breast lesions, ROFO-F RONT, 172(12), 2000, pp. 1052-1056
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN
Objectives: The study compares contrast-detail and microcalcification detec
tability of a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) to a state-of-the-art c
onventional screen-film mammography (SFM) by using different doses in the d
igital system. Materials and Methods: The investigations were performed wit
h an FFDM (Senographe 2000 D, GEMS) and an SFM system (Senographe DMR, GEMS
) using a contrast-detail mammography phantom (CDMAM) and an anthropomorphi
c breast phantom with superimposed microcalcifications. The digital detecto
r was exposed with standard dose of SFM and with a dose reduction of up to
75%. Contrast-detail curves and correct observation ratio (COR) were perfor
med for the CDMAM phantom. ROC analysis with a confidence level ranging fro
m 1 to 5 was done with the results of the anthropomorphic phantom. Results:
Digital mammography with the same dose revealed at least an equivalent or
even higher detectability rate than conventional mammography, COR could be
increased at about 10-25%. The ROC analysis yielded better results for the
FFDM system. The same lesion detectability in digital mammography as in the
conventional method was reached at a dose reduction of about 25%, concerni
ng spot views even at higher reduction. Dose reduction in the anthropomorph
ic phantom resulted in a linear loss of detectability. The same detectabili
ty as in conventional mammography was reached, however, by a dose reduction
of about 50%. Conclusion: The results suggest that FFDM is at least equiva
lent to or - as far as spot views are concerned - superior to conventional
SFM concerning the detectability of simulated lesions. Thus, a potential of
dose reduction is suggested.