Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis - Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability

Citation
Tr. Kuklo et al., Measurement of thoracic and lumbar fracture kyphosis - Evaluation of intraobserver, interobserver, and technique variability, SPINE, 26(1), 2001, pp. 61-65
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology
Journal title
SPINE
ISSN journal
03622436 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
61 - 65
Database
ISI
SICI code
0362-2436(20010101)26:1<61:MOTALF>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Study Design. Statistical analysis of various measurement techniques for th oracolumbar burst fracture kyphosis on lateral radiograph. Objective. To determine the most reliable measurement technique. Summary of Background Data, The treatment of thoracic and lumbar burst frac tures involves many factors, including the degree of resultant kyphosis. Al though various methods have been described, no study has directly compared these methods for reliability and reproducibility. Methods. Fifty lateral radiographs of thoracic and lumbar burst fractures w ere randomly selected and measured on two separate occasions by three spine surgeons using five different measurement techniques. Radiograph quality, fracture type, and the center beam location were determined. Statistical an alysis included analysis of variance for repeated measures and analysis of variance using a generalized linear model. Results. Intraclass correlation coefficients were most consistent for Metho d 1 (rho = 0.83-0.94) followed by Method 4 (rho = 0.65-0.89) and Method 5 ( rho = 0.73-0.85). Intraobserver agreement (% of repeated measures within 5 degrees of the original measurement) ranged between 72% and 98% for all tec hniques for all three observers, with Method 1 showing the best agreement ( 84%-98%). Paired comparisons between observers varied considerably with int erobserver reliability correlation coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.93. Method 1 showed the highest interobserver reliability coefficient (0.81, ra nge 0.71-0.93) followed by Method 5 (0.71, range 0.68-0.75). Method 1 also had the highest percentage of agreement within categories (90% within 5 deg rees). Conclusions. Method 1 (measuring from the superior endplate of the vertebra l body one level above the injured vertebral body to the inferior endplate of the vertebral body one level below) showed the best intraobserver and in terobserver reliability overall.