Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity

Citation
Ld. Petz et al., Selecting donors of platelets for refractory patients on the basis of HLA antibody specificity, TRANSFUSION, 40(12), 2000, pp. 1446-1456
Citations number
68
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
TRANSFUSION
ISSN journal
00411132 → ACNP
Volume
40
Issue
12
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1446 - 1456
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-1132(200012)40:12<1446:SDOPFR>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who are refractory to platelet transfusion as a result of HLA alloimmunization are generally given HLA-matched or crossmatched pl atelets. However, HLA-matched platelets that are matched at HLA-A and -B lo ci (A-matched) or those without any mismatched or cross-reactive antigens ( BU-matched) are frequently unavailable. A disadvantage of crossmatching is that crossmatched platelets have a shelf life of only 5 days, so that cross match tests must be performed frequently for patients requiring long-term p latelet transfusions. An alternative method is the selection of platelets a ccording to the patient's HLA antibody specificity, called the antibody spe cificity prediction (ASP) method. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anti-human globulin-enhanced microlymphocytoto xicity test modified by a double addition of serum and a computer program w ere used to determine the specificity of patients' HLA antibodies. Platelet crossmatching was performed with a solid-phase adherence assay. The percen tage of platelet recovery (PPR) was determined in 1621 platelet transfusion s in an observational study in 114 patients, and the PPR of platelets selec ted by the ASP method was compared with the PPR of those that were HLA-matc hed, crossmatched, or randomly selected. The numbers of potential donors in files of HLA-typed donors as identified by HLA matching vs, the ASP method were determined. RESULTS: After adjustments for covariates, the mean +/- SEM PPR was similar for HLA-matched (21 +/- 4%), cross-matched (23 +/- 4%), and ASP-selected ( 24 +/- 3%) platelets and was significantly lower for randomly selected (15 +/- 1.4%) platelets. For 29 alloimmunized HLA-typed patients, the mean numb er of potential donors found in a file of 7247 HLA-typed donors was 6 who w ere an HLA-A match (median = 1), 33 who were an HLA-BU match (median = 20), and 1426 who were identified by the ASP method (median = 1365). CONCLUSION: The ASP method of donor selection for refractory alloimmunized patients appears as effective as HLA matching or crossmatching. Far more do nors are identified in a file of HLA-typed donors by the ASP method than by HLA matching, and this indicates that the ASP method provides important ad vantages regarding the availability of compatible platelet components.