Problem: To what extent are carbon fibre-reinforced plastics (CFRP) suitabl
e as an osseous integration surface for implants? Method: CFRP test implant
s having a plexus-structured, rhombus-structured, and plexus-structured, hy
droxyapatite surface were implanted in the femura of mini-pigs. Exposure ti
me lasted 12 weeks. The implants were subjected to a macroradiological, a h
istological-histomorphometrical, and a fluorescence-microscopical evaluatio
n. Results: One half of the uncoated, plexus-structured implants were not o
steointegrated, the other half displayed an osteointegration rate of 11.8%
in the spongy area and 29.8% in the cortex layer. The HA-coated test implan
ts showed an osteointegration of 29.5% in the spongiosa and 56.8% in the co
rtex layer. The rhombus-structured test implants had an osteointegration of
29.2% (spongiosa) and 46.2% (cortex layer). Conclusion: Compared to the os
teointegration of metallic, especially titanium surfaces the CFRP surfaces
tested by us fared worse, especially the uncoated, plexus-structured surfac
es. For this reason we view very critically the use of carbon-fibre reinfor
ced plastics together with the surfaces tested by us as osteointegrating su
rfaces.