Various rules have been proposed to identify and exclude live births with i
mplausible values of birth weight for gestational age from large perinatal
data sets. The authors carried out a preliminary evaluation of common rules
by examining the frequency and nature of rule-based exclusions among live
births in Canada (excluding Ontario) between 1992 and 1994. There were 625
(0.09%), 133 (0.02%), 170 (0.02%), and 2,858 (0.40%) live births identified
for exclusion by a median birth weight for gestational age +/-4 standard d
eviations (SD) rule, a +/-5 SD rule, a rule based on expert clinical opinio
n, and a modification of Tukey's rule, respectively, The birth weight and g
estational age distribution of the exclusions depended on the particular ru
le used; for example, 12.1% and 0.3% of live births of greater than or equa
l to4,500 g were excluded under Tukey's rule and the rule based on expert o
pinion, respectively. Infant mortality rates among those excluded were 8-13
times higher than among all live births. Current rules for identifying imp
lausible birth weight for gestational age tend to flag live births at high
risk for infant death. Such rules may erroneously attenuate temporal trends
in important perinatal outcomes.