Land application of manure may produce unacceptable odors. Field experiment
s in undisturbed (no-till) soybean and corn residue were conducted to evalu
ate six liquid swine manure application/incorporation methods. The methods
were injection with a commercial(1) chisel or (2) sweep, (3) incorporation
with tandem disk harrow after broadcast application, (4) broadcast applicat
ion with no incorporation, (5) injection with a narrow-profile knife, and (
6) surface application behind row cleaners. The row cleaner and all injecti
on treatments used spoke-covering wheels. Air samples over the soil surface
were obtained immediately following and one day after manure application,
and odor level was measured by olfactometry (i.e., the amount of air diluti
ons to reach odor threshold). Residue cover and yield were also measured. I
ncorporation techniques typically reduced odor level by a factor of three t
o ten as compared with a broadcast application. One day after application,
odor was greatly reduced and often indistinguishable from that of untreated
soil (no manure application). Residue cover differences among application
methods were more pronounced in soybean residue. Application by the narrow-
profile knife, row cleaner and chisel maintained soybean residue cover bett
er than other incorporation methods yet limited odor similar To these metho
ds. Although cover was reduced over winter, greater soybean residue cover r
emained after planting with fall than with spring manure applications. Diff
erences in odor level and residue cover among methods were less in corn tha
n soybean residue. All incorporation techniques reduced odor levels, and ch
isel incorporation maintained corn residue cover after planting similar to
broadcast application. For both crops, broadcast application maintained the
greatest residue cover but had the highest odor level. Incorporation of ma
nure generally reduced odor reduced residue cover increased corn yield, and
did not affect soybean yield.