Validation of an outcomes instrument for tonsil and adenoid disease

Citation
Mg. Stewart et al., Validation of an outcomes instrument for tonsil and adenoid disease, ARCH OTOLAR, 127(1), 2001, pp. 29-35
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology,"da verificare
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY
ISSN journal
08864470 → ACNP
Volume
127
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
29 - 35
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-4470(200101)127:1<29:VOAOIF>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective: To design and validate a disease-specific health status instrume nt-the Tonsil and Adenoid Health Status Instrument-for use in children with tonsil and adenoid disease. Design: Prospective psychometric and clinimetric instrument validation in 3 stages. Settings: A tertiary academic pediatric specialty hospital and a tertiary a cademic hospital, in 2 different cities. Patients/Other Participants: Children with tonsil and adenoid disease prese nting for evaluation and treatment(n=224). Intervention/Method: Prospective instrument validation. Stage 1 consisted o f initial item testing, reduction, and subscale construction; stage 2, reli ability and validity testing, factor analysis, and final item reduction; an d stage 3, responsiveness analysis. Main Outcome Measures: Test-retest and internal consistency reliability; co ntent, construct, and criterion validity; orthogonal principal components f actor analysis; and response sensitivity analysis. Results: Factor analysis and item analysis confirmed 6 distinct subscales m easuring different constructs (aspects) of disease-specific health status t hat are affected by tonsil and adenoid disease: eating and swallowing, airw ay and breathing, infections, health care utilization, cost of care, and be havior. For each subscale, the Tonsil and Adenoid Health Status Instrument demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (r=0.72-0.88) and internal c onsistency reliability (Cronbach alpha=.73-.87). Content validity was ensur ed during the design process. Construct validity was demonstrated by means of convergent and divergent validity with a global quality-of-life instrume nt (the Child Health Questionnaire, version PF28). Criterion validity was a lso satisfactory. Finally, the instrument was appropriately sensitive, with high standardized response means and effect sizes. Conclusions: The Tonsil and Adenoid Health Status Instrument is a valid, re liable, and sensitive instrument with 6 distinct subscales. This instrument has significant utility for outcomes research in children with tonsil and adenoid disease.