In 1987 and 1995 Indonesia's price and trade polities (intervention regime)
increased the income of Java's urban centres and reduced that of people li
ving in rural Java and the other islands. This happened because the regime
protected manufacturing activities, most of them located in Jakarta, Bandun
g and Surabaya, and taxed primary sector based activities, located outside
urban Java. It protected some primary sector based activities directly but
the entire intervention regime, with manufacturing protection included, tax
ed them. As a result, regions deriving income from primary sector based act
ivities lost. Indonesia's intervention regime is regressive: it transfers i
ncome from poorer to richer regions. This regime and its effects on regiona
l incomes continue. Governments have designed programs to raise the income
of Eastern Indonesia, but have omitted the most effective instrument: openi
ng the economy to international competition. A serious attempt to reduce re
gional income disparities should begin by eliminating barriers to internati
onal trade.