Correlation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters with side effects in kidney transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil

Citation
M. Mourad et al., Correlation of mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetic parameters with side effects in kidney transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil, CLIN CHEM, 47(1), 2001, pp. 88-94
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
ISSN journal
00099147 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
88 - 94
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9147(200101)47:1<88:COMAPP>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used in organ transplanta tion to prevent acute rejection. Because MMF can produce hematologic and/or gastro-intestinal toxicity, therapeutic monitoring is becoming mandatory. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between the clinica l events and the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in adult renal transplantation, Methods: Thirty-one adult kidney recipients were prospectively included in the study. MPA pharmacokinetic profiles (blood sampling at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h after MMF oral dose) were obtained after transplantation (desi red creatinine clearance, 40 mL/min), at 3 months after grafting, and at ev ery clinical event (e.g., side effect or rejection). All patients received a 10-day course of anti-thymocyte globulin cyclosporine, MMF (Ig twice dail y), and Steroids. Results: We divided the 31 patients into two groups (groups 1 and 2). Ten p atients (32%; group 1) had uneventful outcomes, and 21 patients (68%; group 2) presented with MPA-related side effects. For groups 1 and 2, the MPA tr ough concentrations (C-min) were 1.63 +/- 1.07 and 2.29 +/- 1.16 mg/L, resp ectively (P = 0.06), and the areas under the curve (AUCs) for MPA from t(0) , to t(12h) (MPA-AUC(0-12h)) were 39.80 +/- 15.29 and 62.10 +/- 21.07 mg .h /L, respectively (P = 0.0005, two-sample t-test). Three patients experience d acute graft rejection after the oral MMF dose was reduced because of side effects. In this group, the MPA-C-min and MPA-AUC were significantly lower by the time acute rejection occurred (1.00 +/- 0.45 mg/L and 25.00 +/- 6.2 0 mg .h/L respectively). At a fixed dose (1 g twice per day), we compared t he pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA [C-min, the MPA concentration 30 min a fter the oral dose of MMF (C-30)(,) and AUC] according to the presence or a bsence of side effects in the two groups. C-min and AUC did not differ betw een the two groups [C-min = 2.22 +/- 1.13 vs 2.17 +/- 1.13 mg/L (P = 0.9); AUC = 66.82 +/- 29.87 vs 55.70 +/- 11.74 mg .h/L (P = 0.11)]; and C-30 was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (C-30 32.99 +/- 12.59 vs 7. 45 +/- 5.40 mg/L; P <0.0001). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic rela tionship between MPA and clinical events. At a fixed dose of 2 g/day, a hig h C,, is associated with increased risk for side effects. This study sugges ts that dividing the MMF daily oral dose into more than two divided doses m ight prevent early MPA toxicity. (C) 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.