Purpose: To evaluate clearance changes of Tc-99m DTPA aerosol in mismatched
and matched pulmonary perfusion defects.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients (14 women, 7 men; mean age, 51 /- 14 years) with possible pulmonary embolism were included in the study. O
n the day after perfusion (Q) scintigraphy with 5 mCi Tc-99m MAA, radioaero
sol inhalation scintigraphy was performed using 45 mCi Tc-99m DTPA. Immedia
tely and 45 minutes after the inhalation, early and delayed inhalation imag
es (El and DI, respectively) were obtained. Group 1 included 11 patients wi
th mismatched defects who had a high probability of pulmonary embolism acco
rding to the Q/EI scan results. Group 2 included 10 patients with matched d
efects who had a low probability of PE. Contralateral normal lungs of 7 pat
ients in group 2 served as controls (group 3). In groups 1 and 2, regions o
f interest were drawn over the mismatched and matched perfusion defects whe
re they were best visualized, and this region of interest was mirrored to t
he same region on El and DI images. For the control group, this was done in
the contralateral normal lung. Mean counts in each region of interest were
used for quantitative analysis, and the percentage clearance ratio was cal
culated using the following formula: early counts - late counts / early cou
nts x 100.
Results: The average percentage clearances for the three groups were as fol
lows: group 1, 37% +/- 10%; group 2, 21% +/- 4%; group 3, 24% +/- 7%. Diffe
rences between groups 1 and 3 were significant, as were those between group
s 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). Patients with mismatched perfusion defects had increa
sed DTPA clearance compared with the control group and those with matched d
efects.
Conclusions: Vascular occlusion may lead to impairment of the alveolar-capi
llary barrier and consequently an increase in the clearance of Tc-99m DTPA
aerosol in embolized regions. Immediately after inhalation, Tc-99m DTPA ima
ging should be started in the projection where perfusion defects are best s
een to avoid potential misinterpretation of pulmonary embolism.