Survey of effects of anesthesia protocols on hemodynamic variables in porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation laboratory models before induction of cardiac arrest
V. Wenzel et al., Survey of effects of anesthesia protocols on hemodynamic variables in porcine cardiopulmonary resuscitation laboratory models before induction of cardiac arrest, COMPAR MED, 50(6), 2000, pp. 644-648
Objective: An advantage of animal models in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (
CPR) research is the possibility to control confounding variables that may
be impossible to standardize in clinical trials. A neglected effect of the
anesthesia protocol in porcine CPR studies may be its impact on hemodynamic
variables before induction of cardiac arrest. Accordingly, the purpose of
the study reported here was to evaluate published CPR reports with regard t
o their anesthesia protocol.
Methods: Of 100 articles that reported on laboratory models simulating card
iac arrest between 1987 and 1997 in peer-reviewed journals, 25 met inclusio
n criteria and were analyzed for values of coronary perfusion pressure, mea
n arterial pressure, heart rate, temperature, and cardiac index before indu
ction of cardiac arrest. Subsequently, mean values for all animals in a giv
en report were calculated and corrected for group size; statistical analysi
s was not performed since this was a survey only.
Results: Different anesthesia protocols resulted in a widely distributed pa
ttern of hemodynamic variables prior to induction of cardiac arrest. Ranges
compared with reference values were: heart rate, 100 to 122 beats/min vers
us 105 +/- 11 beats/min; mean arterial pressure, 68 to 130 mm Hg versus 102
+/- 9 mm Hg; coronary perfusion pressure, 55 to 114 mm Hg (no reference va
lue); cardiac index, 69 to 152 ml/kg/min versus 147 +/- 22 ml/kg/min; body
temperature, 37 to 38.5 degreesC versus 38.5 +/- 0.7 degreesC,
Conclusion: The anesthesia protocol may have an impact on hemodynamic varia
bles before induction of cardiac arrest in CPR studies.