This paper describes and Explains the reception of mendelism among French b
iologists at the beginning of the 20th Century. Three dimensions of descrip
tion must be taken into account: scholarly diffusion; transmission of the n
ew science through teaching and textbooks; and effective research. These th
ree axes of description do not provide the same picture: Mendelian researc
h was widely reported among specialists; no significant teaching of Mendeli
sm took place in the years 1900-1930; by 1930 only one biologist, Lucien Cu
enot, had carried out significant genetic research, but he abandoned his Me
ndelian research in 1914. The resistance to Mendelism can be attributed to
four categories of factors, none of which is sufficient. The first category
includes a series of intellectual factors: a massively positivist concepti
on of science, an approach to heredity that privileged a 'physiological' th
eory, and a poor development of cytology. The second set of factors stems f
rom the failure of French academic biologists to establish a strong interac
tion with plant and animal breeding. The third factor is the relatively wea
k influence of the eugenic ideology in France. Finally, the particular orga
nization of French universities, together with the deaths of numerous young
scientists during World War I, amplified the effects of the previous facto
rs. (C) 2000 Academie des sciences/Editions scientifiques ct medicales Else
vier SAS.