Kh. Abbott et al., Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support, CRIT CARE M, 29(1), 2001, pp. 197-201
Objective: To identify critical psychosocial supports and areas of conflict
for families of intensive care unit (ICU) patients during decisions to wit
hdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment.
Design: Cross-sectional survey.
Setting: Six intensive care units in a tertiary care academic medical cente
r.
Participants: Forty-eight family members, one per case, of patients previou
sly hospitalized in the ICU who had been considered for withdrawal or withh
olding of life-sustaining treatment.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and Main Results:Two raters coded transcripts of audiotaped in
terviews with family members about their experiences in the ICU and the dec
ision-making process for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatme
nt. Codes identified sources of conflict and personal, institutional, and s
taff supports on which families relied during the decision-making process.
Forty-six percent of respondents perceived conflict during their family mem
ber's ICU stay; the vast majority of conflicts were between themselves and
the medical staff and involved communication or perceived unprofessional be
havior (such as disregarding the primary caregiver in treatment discussions
). Sixty-three percent of family members previously had spoken with the pat
ient about his or her end-of-life treatment preferences, which helped to le
ssen the burden of the treatment decision, Forty-eight percent of family me
mbers reported the reassuring presence of clergy, and 27% commented on the
need for improved physical space to have family discussion and conferences
with physicians. Forty-eight percent of family members singled out their at
tending physician as the preferred source of information and reassurance.
Conclusions: Many families perceived conflict during end-of-life treatment
discussions in the ICU, Conflicts centered on communication and behavior of
staff. Families identified pastoral care and prior discussion of treatment
preferences as sources of psychosocial support during these discussions. F
amilies sought comfort in the identification and contact of a "doctor-in-ch
arge.'' ICU policies such as family conference rooms and lenient visitation
accommodate families during end-of-life decision-making.