Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support

Citation
Kh. Abbott et al., Families looking back: One year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support, CRIT CARE M, 29(1), 2001, pp. 197-201
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
197 - 201
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200101)29:1<197:FLBOYA>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Objective: To identify critical psychosocial supports and areas of conflict for families of intensive care unit (ICU) patients during decisions to wit hdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Six intensive care units in a tertiary care academic medical cente r. Participants: Forty-eight family members, one per case, of patients previou sly hospitalized in the ICU who had been considered for withdrawal or withh olding of life-sustaining treatment. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results:Two raters coded transcripts of audiotaped in terviews with family members about their experiences in the ICU and the dec ision-making process for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatme nt. Codes identified sources of conflict and personal, institutional, and s taff supports on which families relied during the decision-making process. Forty-six percent of respondents perceived conflict during their family mem ber's ICU stay; the vast majority of conflicts were between themselves and the medical staff and involved communication or perceived unprofessional be havior (such as disregarding the primary caregiver in treatment discussions ). Sixty-three percent of family members previously had spoken with the pat ient about his or her end-of-life treatment preferences, which helped to le ssen the burden of the treatment decision, Forty-eight percent of family me mbers reported the reassuring presence of clergy, and 27% commented on the need for improved physical space to have family discussion and conferences with physicians. Forty-eight percent of family members singled out their at tending physician as the preferred source of information and reassurance. Conclusions: Many families perceived conflict during end-of-life treatment discussions in the ICU, Conflicts centered on communication and behavior of staff. Families identified pastoral care and prior discussion of treatment preferences as sources of psychosocial support during these discussions. F amilies sought comfort in the identification and contact of a "doctor-in-ch arge.'' ICU policies such as family conference rooms and lenient visitation accommodate families during end-of-life decision-making.