A. Moeller et al., A comparison of techniques for preparing fish fillet for ICP-AES multielemental analysis and the microwave digestion of whole fish, FOOD ADDIT, 18(1), 2001, pp. 19-29
Four catfish fillet homogenate treatments before multielemental metal analy
sis by simultaneous inductively coupled plasma/atomic emission spectroscopy
were compared in triplicate. These treatments were: nitric acid wet-ashing
by Parr bomb digestion; nitric acid wet-ashing by microwave digestion; tet
ramethylammonium hydroxide/nitric acid wet digestion; and dry-ashing. The t
etramethylammonium hydroxide/nitric acid method was imprecise (coefficients
of variation >20%). The dry-ashing method was fast and sensitive but had l
ow recoveries of 50% for spiked Pb and Al and was not as precise as the Par
r bomb or microwave treatments. The Parr bomb method was the most precise m
ethod but was less sensitive than the microwave method which had nearly the
same precision. The microwave method was then adapted to homogenates of sm
all whole fish less than or equal to3 cm in length. The whole fish homogena
te required more vigorous digestion conditions, and addition of more acid a
fter the evaporative step because of the presence of less oxidizable and ac
id-soluble components than fillet. The whole fish homogenate was also more
heterogeneous than catfish fillet. A quality assurance protocol to demonstr
ate homogenate uniformity is essential. The use of a non-specialized microw
ave oven system allowed precise results for fillet and whole fish homogenat
es.