The use of computers to support group work - as a Group Decision Support Sy
stem (GDSS) - on strategy making has grown over the last decade. Some GDSS'
s have a facilitator managing the computer with the group viewing a public
screen displaying the debate, problem definition, and agreements of the gro
up as it negotiates strategies. Others involve members of the group in the
direct input of data that forms part of the problem definition - data that
is then used by the group employing electronic voting and other organizing
devices. This paper discusses a real case relating to an organization seeki
ng to reach important agreements about its strategy. The case involved the
top management team and over 50 senior managers. The organization used a fa
cilitator driven GDSS for some of this work, and a networked system for oth
er parts. Some of the meetings were video taped, some were observed through
one-way mirrors, and all of the participants were interviewed about their
reactions to the different systems. This paper reports on some of the signi
ficant contrasts between the two approaches.