Purpose: Uncertainties in patient repositioning and organ motion are accoun
ted for by defining a planning target volume (PTV). We make recommendations
on issues not explicitly discussed in existing protocols for PTV design.
Methods: A quantity called "coverage" is defined to quantify how effectivel
y a PTV encompasses the clinical target volume, and is applied to examine t
he impact of several factors, A stochastic simulation is used to determine
the coverage required for a desirable balance between tumor control probabi
lity (TCP) and the irradiated volume. Using a sample anatomy, we assess the
importance of the method used to add uncertainties, the shape of the uncer
tainty distribution, the effect of systematic uncertainties, and the use of
nonuniform margins. Additionally, we examine the benefit of patient immobi
lization techniques.
Results: Our example indicates that 95% coverage is a reasonable goal for t
reatment planning. Using this as a comparison value, our example indicates
quadrature addition of uncertainties predicts smaller margins (7 mm) than l
inear addition (11 mm), Gaussian distribution of uncertainties (7 mm) requi
re the same margin as a uniform distribution (7 mm), systematic uncertainti
es have a small effect on TCP below a threshold value (4 mm), and nonunifor
m margins allow only a slight reduction of irradiated volume.
Conclusion: We recommend that uncertainties should generally be added in qu
adrature, the exact shape of the uncertainty distribution is not critical,
systematic uncertainties should be maintained below some threshold value, a
nd nonuniform margins may be effective when uncertainties are anisotropic,
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.