D. Arola et al., A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations, J DENT, 29(1), 2001, pp. 63-73
Objective: To compare the mechanical behavior, and infer differences in fra
cture resistance, of mandibular molars with amalgam and composite MOD resto
rations to that of an unrestored molar.
Method: Finite element models were developed for an unrestored molar and mo
lars with MOD amalgam and composite restorations. The location and magnitud
e of maximum principal stress resulting from simultaneous mechanical and th
ermal loads were determined for each molar using a series of designed exper
iments. An analysis of variance was conducted with the components of stress
to distinguish the relative influence of oral parameters and restoration o
n the stress distribution in each molar.
Results: The maximum principal stress in the unrestored molar was the large
st of all three molars examined and occurred within the dentin along the pu
lpal wall. Maximum principal stresses in the molars with amalgam and compos
ite restorations both occurred along the cavosurface margin. Maximum princi
pal stresses in the molar with amalgam restoration occurred at the pulpal f
loor and lingual wall junction and resulted from large occlusal loads. Alth
ough occlusal loading had minimal effects on the stress distribution within
the molar with composite restoration, low oral temperatures were responsib
le for the maximum principal stresses, which were found at the lingual marg
in and occlusal surface junction.
Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the magnitude of maximum
stress that occurred in the molars with amalgam and light curing composite
restorations. However, the location and orientation of maximum stress in t
he restored molars were largely dependent on the restorative material. Alth
ough clinical studies report that tooth fracture occurs predominately to re
stored molars, the unrestored molar experienced the highest stress in this
investigation. Therefore, the reduction in fracture resistance of restored
posterior teeth appears to result from changes in the location of maximum s
tress resulting from mastication and temperature changes. (C) 2001 Elsevier
Science Ltd. All rights reserved.