Scoring of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) is typically achieve
d by the evaluation of the reproducibility of the whole emission and/or wit
hin narrow bands. Screening outcomes are influenced not only by the specifi
c combination of the subdivision scheme (i.e., the number, position, and ba
ndwidth of the narrow bands) and the threshold used to determine pass and r
efer, but also by the accuracy with which the reproducibility is estimated.
This study was designed to examine what factors affect the accuracy of the
reproducibility estimate and how the accuracy of the reproducibility estim
ate together with the choice of the subdivision scheme/thresholds affect CE
OAE scoring. Simulations with real CEOAEs corrupted with synthesized noise
indicated that the reproducibility estimate is influenced by time-windowing
and band-pass filtering: the longer the time-window or the broader the ban
dwidth of the filter, the more accurate the estimate. Quantitative figures
on numerical scoring were given in terms of the referral rate and were deri
ved from CEOAEs recorded in a clinical environment from more than 3400 newb
orns. The narrow bands were extracted according to 12 different subdivision
schemes covering the 1.5-4-Hz range. The referral rate was found to depend
on the subdivision scheme being used: (i) the worst results were obtained
considering four narrow bands at 1.6-2.4-3.2-4 kHz; (ii) the best results w
ere obtained considering two narrow bands at 2.25 and 3.75 kHz; (iii) bandw
idths greater than I kHz resulted in the lowest referral rates. Also, scori
ng based on the extraction of four narrow bands produced the most unstable
results, i.e., a small change in the threshold might cause even a great cha
nge in the referral rate. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.
1121/1.1326949].