Data processing options and response scoring for OAE-based newborn hearingscreening

Citation
G. Tognola et al., Data processing options and response scoring for OAE-based newborn hearingscreening, J ACOUST SO, 109(1), 2001, pp. 283-290
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Multidisciplinary,"Optics & Acoustics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
ISSN journal
00014966 → ACNP
Volume
109
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
283 - 290
Database
ISI
SICI code
0001-4966(200101)109:1<283:DPOARS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Scoring of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) is typically achieve d by the evaluation of the reproducibility of the whole emission and/or wit hin narrow bands. Screening outcomes are influenced not only by the specifi c combination of the subdivision scheme (i.e., the number, position, and ba ndwidth of the narrow bands) and the threshold used to determine pass and r efer, but also by the accuracy with which the reproducibility is estimated. This study was designed to examine what factors affect the accuracy of the reproducibility estimate and how the accuracy of the reproducibility estim ate together with the choice of the subdivision scheme/thresholds affect CE OAE scoring. Simulations with real CEOAEs corrupted with synthesized noise indicated that the reproducibility estimate is influenced by time-windowing and band-pass filtering: the longer the time-window or the broader the ban dwidth of the filter, the more accurate the estimate. Quantitative figures on numerical scoring were given in terms of the referral rate and were deri ved from CEOAEs recorded in a clinical environment from more than 3400 newb orns. The narrow bands were extracted according to 12 different subdivision schemes covering the 1.5-4-Hz range. The referral rate was found to depend on the subdivision scheme being used: (i) the worst results were obtained considering four narrow bands at 1.6-2.4-3.2-4 kHz; (ii) the best results w ere obtained considering two narrow bands at 2.25 and 3.75 kHz; (iii) bandw idths greater than I kHz resulted in the lowest referral rates. Also, scori ng based on the extraction of four narrow bands produced the most unstable results, i.e., a small change in the threshold might cause even a great cha nge in the referral rate. (C) 2001 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10. 1121/1.1326949].