Crucial to understanding the reception of Renaissance music in nineteenth-c
entury Germany is an appreciation of the contradictory components of Romant
ic historicism. The tension between subjective and objective historicism is
fundamental to the historiographical reception of Renaissance music, epito
mizing the interdependency of historical representation and modern reform.
Protestant authors seeking to reform church music elevated two distinct rep
ertories - Renaissance Italian music and Lutheran compositions from the Ref
ormation era - as ideal archetypes: these competing paradigms reflect signi
ficantly different historiographical and ideological trends. Early romantic
commentators, such as Hoffmann and Thibaut, elevated Palestrina as a unive
rsal model, constructing a golden age of old Italian church music by analog
y with earlier narratives in art history; later historians, such as Winterf
eld and Spitta, condemned the subjectivity of earlier reformers, seeking in
stead to revivify the objective foundations of Protestant church music. Bot
h approaches are united, however, by the use of deterministic modes of narr
ative emplotment.