We study the problem of providing multiple but identical public goods as "o
ptions" to agents with single-peaked preferences, a problem introduced by [
Miyagawa, E., 1998a. Mechanisms for providing a menu of public goods. Ph.D.
dissertation, University of Rochester]. For every feasible interval of loc
ations and every preference profile, a solution chooses m locations for the
m public goods. Each location is an option and each agent selects his most
preferred option. For m=2 [Moulin, H., 1984. Generalized Concorcet-winners
for single-peaked preferences and single-plateaued preferences, Social Cho
ice and Welfare 1, 127-147] studies Nash's and Arrow's Independence of Irre
levant Alternatives (IIA). We show that for m=2 the 'extreme peaks' solutio
n is the only solution satisfying Pareto-optimality, Nash's IIA, Arrow's II
A, and interval continuity. We also show that for m greater than or equal t
o3, Pareto-optimality and interval continuity are incompatible. (C) 2001 El
sevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.