The effects of carbon dioxide on exercise-induced asthma: an unlikely explanation for the effects of Buteyko breathing training

Citation
Wk. Al-delaimy et al., The effects of carbon dioxide on exercise-induced asthma: an unlikely explanation for the effects of Buteyko breathing training, MED J AUST, 174(2), 2001, pp. 72-74
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
ISSN journal
0025729X → ACNP
Volume
174
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
72 - 74
Database
ISI
SICI code
0025-729X(20010115)174:2<72:TEOCDO>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the effect of breathing 3% CO2 on exercise-induced a sthma (EIA), as a raised airway CO2 level is suggested to mediate the effec ts of Buteyko breathing training (BBT). Design: Double-blind crossover study, using a standard laboratory-based exe rcise challenge, with EIA defined as a fall of 15% or greater in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) within 30 minutes of completing a s tandard exercise protocol. Subjects: 10 adults with confirmed EIA. Intervention: Air enriched with 3% CO2 during and for 10 minutes after exer cise. Outcome measures: Maximum percentage fall in FEV1 after exercise. Area unde r curve (AUC) of the decrease in FEV1 with time. Results: Mean maximum fall in FEV1 was similar: 19.9% with air, and 26.9% w ith 3% CO2 (P=0.12). The mean AUC for the total 30-minute post-exercise per iod was 355 for air and 520 for 3% CO2 (P=0.07). After discontinuing the 3% CO2 at 10 minutes after exercise, there was a further and sustained fall i n FEV1. Mean AUC for the period 10-30 minutes post-exercise was significant ly greater for CO2 than air (275 and 137, respectively [P= 0.02]). Mean min ute ventilation was increased when subjects exercised breathing 3% CO2: 77. 5 L/min for 3% CO2, compared with 68.7 L/min for air (P= 0.02). Conclusion: Breathing 3% CO2 during exercise does not prevent EIA. The shap e of the FEV1 response curve after 3% CO2 suggests that a greater degree of EIA (because of increased minute ventilation during exercise) was opposed by a direct relaxant effect of CO2 on the airway. Increased airway CO2 alon e is an unlikely mechanism for the reported benefits of BET; nevertheless, further study of the effects of voluntary hypoventilation in asthma is warr anted.