Most studies of political action committees (PACs) focus on the incumb
ent-oriented contribution strategies of PACs, whereas contributions to
open-seat candidates remain relatively unexplored. Based on the assum
ption that open-seat candidates have an insatiable need for campaign m
oney, we model the allocations of PACs to open-seat senate candidates
from 1980 to 1994. The results. of our analyses indicate that allocati
ons in open-seat senate elections are more partisan than those in incu
mbent elections, although incumbent-like effects are evident in alloca
tions by corporate, labor, and trade association PACs, which largely s
upport aspirant House of Representatives members who have previously e
xisting connections to monied interests. Unlike the bipartisan behavio
r exhibited by investor PACs in open house races, labor and investor i
nterests reinforce the partisan divisions in senate contests by engagi
ng in competitive funding of opposing candidates.