Nitrogen management in 'adequate' input maize-based agriculture in the derived savanna benchmark zone of Benin Republic

Citation
B. Vanlauwe et al., Nitrogen management in 'adequate' input maize-based agriculture in the derived savanna benchmark zone of Benin Republic, PLANT SOIL, 228(1), 2001, pp. 61-71
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
PLANT AND SOIL
ISSN journal
0032079X → ACNP
Volume
228
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
61 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
0032-079X(200101)228:1<61:NMI'IM>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Although the West-African moist savanna zone has a high potential for crop production, yields on farmers' fields are, on average, far below this poten tial, mainly due to the low use of external sources of nutrients. Since the mid-1990s, it has become clear that in order to upgrade crop production to levels needed to sustain the growing population without further degrading the soil resource base, inorganic fertilizers are required. Due to the phys ico-chemical nature of these soils and the relatively high cost of inorgani c fertilizers, a general consensus exists in the research and development c ommunity that these inorganic inputs need to be complemented with organic m atter. Here, we explore options to produce organic matter in-situ and evalu ate the impact of combining inorganic and organic sources of N on maize yie lds, focusing on the densely populated derived savanna (DS) benchmark of Be nin Republic. Although most of the farmers (93%) in this benchmark use inor ganic fertilizer, applications rates are low (on average, 27 kg N ha(-1)). A significant response to N was observed for 96% of the studied farmers' fi elds. Grain and herbaceous legumes were observed to produce between 383 and 8700 kg dry matter ha(-1) in the benchmark area. Inoculation with Rhizobia and i norganic P additions were shown to significantly improve biomass production on sites with low contents of Rhizobia and P. Although maize grain yield w as observed to increase significantly following a legume compared with foll owing a maize crop or natural fallow, these increases were insufficient in the case of a cowpea crop or were obtained at the cost of leaving the field 'idle' for a whole year in the case of a herbaceous Mucuna fallow. Topping up a cowpea haulms equivalent of 45 kg N ha(-1) with 45 kg urea-N ha(-1) w as shown to give maize yields similar to the yields obtained after applying 90 kg urea-N ha(-1) on the poorest fields. Moreover, on these fields, a po sitive interaction between cowpea-N and urea-N sources of 200 kg grain ha(- 1) was observed. On the richest fields, the effects of applied organic matt er and fertilizer were additive. Agroforestry systems are alternative cropping systems that produce organic matter in-situ. As tree roots go down below the rooting depth of food crops , sub-soil fertility was observed to influence tree biomass production. Yie ld increases in tree-crop intercrop systems - such as alley cropping - in t he absence of inorganic inputs are often reduced by the occurrence of tree- crop competition. In cut-and-carry systems, where tree prunings are harvest ed from a field adjacent to the crop land, increases in maize grain yield c aused by addition of those prunings were observed to be on the low side. Mi xing these residues with urea, however, was shown to lead to added benefits of about 500 kg grains ha(-1), relative to the treatments with sole inputs of organic matter or urea. Although residue quality was shown to affect ma ize N uptake in a pot trial, its impact under field conditions was minimal for the range of considered residue qualities. In an alley cropping trial, maize yield was shown to be sustained on a non-degraded site and enhanced o n a degraded site, when a minimal amount of mineral fertilizer was added wi th the prunings, whereas fertilizer application alone failed to do so in bo th cases. Although the discussed cropping systems have a large potential to improve c rop production in the DS benchmark and beyond, the rate and extent of adopt ion of those technologies by the farmer community will determine their agro nomic and socio-economic robustness.