N. Hopkinson et Pm. Dickens, Using stereolithography tools for injection moulding: research into tensile tool failure and unexpected benefits of the process, P I MEC E B, 214(10), 2000, pp. 891-899
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering Management /General
Journal title
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART B-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MANUFACTURE
The use of stereolithography (SL) parts as injection moulding tools offers
many advantages over traditional tool making approaches. In particular, the
time required to convert a computer aided design (CAD) file to the final t
ool is dramatically reduced as may be the costs in creating the tool. Howev
er, the process has been perceived to have a number of drawbacks which are,
in the main, associated with the poor thermal and mechanical properties of
the SL resins.
Research was performed which involved the production and use of an SL tool
to injection mould a series of parts in polypropylene. Measurements were ma
de of the forces required to eject parts from the tool in order to assess t
he possibility of tensile tool failure during part ejection. The measured f
orces were compared with predicted values which had been calculated using p
reviously devised equations. In addition, temperatures were recorded throug
hout the injection moulding cycle to assess the tool's strength at differen
t times. Surface roughness measurements were also taken to characterize the
ejection process more closely and observe any changes to surface roughness
caused by moulding parts. A finite element analysis was made of the heat t
ransfer in the tool to help with prediction of ejection forces.
Measurements of ejection forces and heat transfer indicated that, contrary
to existing recommendations, part ejection should be performed shortly afte
r injection. Accurate predictions of ejection force were shown to be unatta
inable given the difficulty in finding accurate values for the variables us
ed in the force prediction equations. Measurements of heat transfer coupled
with surface roughness suggested that the low thermal properties of SL too
ls actually work in favour of the process rather than against it. This conc
eptual about-turn regarding the role of thermal properties in SL injection
moulding tools indicates that further benefits may be derived from the new
technology.