Over the last four decades there have been remarkable advances in the diagn
osis and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE)-pulmonary embolism (PE)
and deep venous thrombosis (DVT). We have moved from no objective documenta
tion to a plethora of ever improving imaging studies. Evolving treatment mo
dalities have reduced the mortality duc to PE to similar to2%. Shorter hosp
italizations followed by outpatient therapy are a growing reality The use o
f primary prophylaxis is increasing, but more widespread use must be encour
aged. Despite the many accomplishments, too many patients with VTE with its
high mortality without treatment remain undiagnosed. There is a critical n
eed to improve the role of the patient's history in identifying patients wh
o warrant objective testing. The ideal would be the development of a biolog
ical marker of VTE, similar to the creatinine kinase-MB, creatinine kinase-
MM, or troponin I in acute myocardial infarction.