J. Brown et al., Some practical issues in the design, monitoring and analysis of a sequential randomized trial in pressure sore prevention, STAT MED, 19(24), 2000, pp. 3389-3400
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research General Topics
A sequential double blind (assessor and patient) triangular design was used
to compare the incidence of pressure sores following elective major surger
y among patients lying on a standard foam mattress with those on a dry visc
o-elastic polymer pad during their operation. A total of 446 patients were
recruited into the trial between 1994 and 1996. Interim analyses were carri
ed out after 181 patients were entered into the trial and then subsequently
after approximately every 100 patients recruited. The trial unexpectedly r
eached a stopping boundary at the first interim analysis, however the Indep
endent Data Monitoring Committee recommended continuation of the trial. The
y were concerned that there was a need for a larger definitive trial and ab
out an apparent treatment by centre interaction. They required a substudy t
o be undertaken to further validate the subjective endpoint, and that furth
er sensitivity analyses of the main trail endpoint should be carried out in
the second interim analysis. The trial was stopped at the third interim an
alysis when again a stopping boundary was crossed indicating that the gel p
ad was associated with significantly fewer pressure sores than the standard
mattress (log odds ratio -0.7, (95 per cent confidence interval (CI), -1.2
8,-0.11), p=0.02) (estimate CI, p-value adjusted for group sequential condu
ct). The design, monitoring and analysis of this trial will be presented as
an example of the practical problems or non-problems encountered for the l
ocal hospitals, for the trials unit, for the data monitoring committee and
for the funding committee. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.