Calibration procedures to determine strip widths for use by the Department
of Resource Surveys and Remote Sensing (DRSRS) in its aerial surveys are va
lidated by statistical analysis. Tests were made for differences in observe
r, aircraft and between using photography (camera) and direct observation (
naked eye) in the determination of strip widths on the ground. The relation
ship between strip widths measured on the ground and in the air was determi
ned using regression analysis. Tests were also made for differences between
population estimates reported by DRSRS and those recalculated using report
ed strip widths for elephant, kongoni, wildebeest and cattle. There appears
to be no significant differences between observer performance and between
reported and recalculated population estimates for all species except cattl
e. A significant difference was found between strip widths obtained by phot
ography and those through direct observation, with photography values being
14% higher at ground level. Strip widths measured while the aircraft was i
n the air were highly correlated to those measured while on the ground (r =
0.97). Overall, it can be concluded that the DRSRS standardization of obse
rvers, calibration of the aircraft and calculation of population estimates
were carried out correctly. Finally, it is recommended that the difference
in strip widths determined from photography and through direct observation
needs to be considered in the final calculation of population estimates.