Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Fkl. Chan et al., Randomized trial of low-dose misoprostol and naproxen vs. nabumetone to prevent recurrent upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ALIM PHARM, 15(1), 2001, pp. 19-24
Background: Prophylactic misoprostol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory dru
gs (NSAIDs) with low gastric toxicity (nabumetone) has been shown to reduce
mucosal injury.
Aim: To compare nabumetone vs. co-therapy of naproxen with low-dose misopro
stol for secondary prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NSAID u
sers.
Methods: NSAID users presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding were e
nrolled if they required long-term NSAIDs. After ulcer healing, they were r
andomized to receive: naproxen (500-1000 mg/day) and misoprostol (200 mug b
.d.), or nabumetone (1000-1500 mg/day) and placebo misoprostol for 24 weeks
. The primary end-point was recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The
secondary end-point was the proportion of patients suffering from major gas
trointestinal events including ulcer bleeding, symptomatic ulcers and sever
e dyspepsia.
Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the intention-to-treat ana
lysis (misoprostol/naproxen 45, nabumetone 45). Recurrent bleeding occurred
in 10 patients (22.2%) receiving misoprostol/naproxen compared with three
(6.7%) receiving nabumetone (relative risk 3.33, 95% CI: 0.98-11.32, P=0.06
9). The proportion of patients suffering from major gastrointestinal events
at 24 weeks was 31.1% in the misoprostol/naproxen group and 28.9% in the n
abumetone group.
Conclusions: Misoprostol/naproxen is not superior to nabumetone for seconda
ry prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Neither low-dose misopros
tol nor nabumetone is adequate for high-risk NSAID users.