Retrospective study on fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray efficacyin patients with allergic rhinitis: evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters
Mt. Ventura et al., Retrospective study on fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray efficacyin patients with allergic rhinitis: evaluation of clinical and laboratory parameters, ALLERGY, 56(1), 2001, pp. 29-34
Background: In allergic rhinitis, allergenic stimulation causes the release
of various mediators that induce symptoms and the development of chronic i
nflammation, which, in turn, is caused by cells involved in the late phase
of inflammation, such as eosinophils. The eosinophils also cause damage at
the mucosal level through the secretion of eosinophil cationic protein and
other preformed factors contained in their granules. The objective was to v
erify the efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in patient
s with allergic rhinitis; in a retrospective study, we have evaluated media
tors of inflammation, making correlations with the clinical symptoms score
during and outside the pollen season.
Methods: Forty patients with allergic rhinitis and 15 normal controls were
included in our study. Eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil chemotactic
activity, and blood and nasal lavage cosinophil count were evaluated as lab
oratory parameters.
Results: We found a significant increase in nasal lavage levels of eosinoph
il cationic protein in allel gic patients, and this was strictly correlated
with the clinical symptoms score. No differences were found in the eosinop
hil count of allergic patients and in the serum eosinophil cationic protein
of patients sensitized to seasonal allergens in comparison with normal sub
jects. By contrast, an increase in serum cosinophil cationic protein level
was found in patients sensitized to perennial allergens. After topical admi
nistration of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray, a reduction in na
sal lavage eosinophil cationic protein secretion was obtained with a reduct
ion of eosinophil chemotactic activity at the local level. This reduction c
orrelated with an improvement of clinical symptoms.
Conclusions: The clinical improvement and reduction in nasal lavage eosinop
hil cationic protein and eosinophil chemotactic activity after administrati
on of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray further confirms the role
of this treatment in allergic rhinitis.