A. Raben et al., Diurnal metabolic profiles after 14 d of an ad libitum high-starch, high-sucrose, or high-fat diet in normal weight never-obese and postobese women, AM J CLIN N, 73(2), 2001, pp. 177-189
Background: The influence of the amount and type of carbohydrates in the di
et on risk factors for obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease remain
s unclear.
Objective: We investigated the effects of 2 low-fat diets (high-sucrose and
high-starch) and a high-fat diet on glycemia, lipidemia, and hormonal resp
onses in never-obese and postobese women.
Design: Eighteen normal-weight women (8 postobese and 10 never-obese) consu
med 3 ad libitum diets (high-fat, high-starch, and high-sucrose) for 14 d e
ach. On day 15, we measured fasting and postprandial glucose, lactate, insu
lin, triacylglycerol, nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), glycerol, glucagon,
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and glucagonlike peptide 1.
Results: The high-sucrose diet induced significantly lower total areas unde
r the curve (AUCs) for glucose and NEFA and a significantly higher lactate
AUC than did the high-fat and high-starch diets; there were no significant
differences in the insulin AUCs. The triacylglycerol AUC was greater with t
he high-fat and high-sucrose diets than with the high-starch diet. Gastroin
testinal hormone concentrations differed between diets, but not between the
2 subject groups. Comparisons between subject groups for all diets combine
d showed lower relative insulin resistance and lower AUCs for glucose, insu
lin, and triacylglycerol in the postobese group.
Conclusions: High-starch and high-sucrose diets had no adverse effects on p
ostprandial glycemia, insulinemia, or lipidemia compared with a high-fat di
et. A sucrose-rich diet may improve glucose metabolism, but may have an adv
erse effect on lipidemia, compared with a starch-rich diet. Postobese women
seemed to be more insulin-sensitive acid more efficient at storing triacyl
glycerol than were never-obese women, regardless of dietary composition.