Background: Healthy young women who engage in an exercise program may lose
fat that is not reflected in body weight changes because of concurrent gain
s in fat-free mass (FFM).
Objective: This study addressed the question of how well anthropometry-base
d predictive equations can resolve these changes.
Design: Several widely used skinfold-thickness- or circumference-based equa
tions were compared by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to study 150
healthy young women before and after 8 wk of Army basic combat training (av
erage energy expenditure: 11.7 MJ/d).
Results: Women lost 1.2 +/- 2.6 kg fat ((x) over bar +/- SD) and gained 2.5
+/- 1.5 kg FFM. Fat loss (r = 0.47), but not FFM gain (r = 0.01), correlat
ed with initial fatness. Thus, for many women who lost fat, body weight did
not change or increased. Fat loss was associated with a reduction in abdom
inal circumference but this alone was not a consistent marker of fat loss.
One circumference equation and one skinfold-thickness equation yielded the
smallest residual SDs (2.0% and 1.9% body fat, respectively) compared with
the other equations in predicting body fat. The sensitivity and specificity
of the best equations in predicting changes in percentage body fat were no
t better than 55% and 66%, respectively.
Conclusions: These data suggest that for women, anthropometry can provide b
etter estimates of fatness than body mass index but it is still relatively
insensitive to short-term alterations in body composition. Not surprisingly
, the circumference equation that includes the most labile sites of female
fat deposition (ie, waist and hips instead of upper arm or thigh) proved to
be the most reliable.