Methods and constraints for the correction of the error beam pick-up in single dish radio observations

Citation
F. Bensch et al., Methods and constraints for the correction of the error beam pick-up in single dish radio observations, ASTRON ASTR, 365(2), 2001, pp. 285-293
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Space Sciences
Journal title
ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
ISSN journal
00046361 → ACNP
Volume
365
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
285 - 293
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-6361(200101)365:2<285:MACFTC>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The beam pattern of a single dish radio telescope is given by the main beam and additional components at larger angles, usually called error beam or s tray pattern. The latter have relatively small peak amplitudes (typ. below -25 dB), depending on the rms surface error of the primary reflector. Howev er, because of their large angular extent, they are sensitive to extended s ources; and a significant fraction of the observed intensity can result fro m error beam pick-up. For (sub-)mm observations suffering from error beam p ick-up we introduce a new temperature scale for the corrected data, the cor rected main beam brightness temperature T-mb,T-c, which provides a better a pproximation to the intensity detected by the main beam than the commonly u sed antenna temperature and main beam brightness temperature. We consider t wo different correction methods. The first method uses complementary observ ations obtained with a smaller telescope. Smeared to the angular resolution of the error beam pattern they provide an estimate of the error beam Dick- up in the observations of the large telescope. For the second method! the e rror beam pick-up is de-convolved from the observed map in Fourier space. T he requirements for both correction methods and their advantages and limita tions are discussed in detail. Both correction methods require additional o bservations, unless the full spatial extent of the emission is observed. We find that the deconvolution method is attractive for the correction of ful ly sampled maps with an angular extent much larger than the error beam patt ern. For smaller maps and more sparsely sampled observations, the subtracti on method is favorable, because the additional observations with a small te lescope are less time consuming.