This study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of three practice me
thods, (a) feedback as knowledge of performance (KP), (b) feedback as
knowledge of results combined with the goal-setting method, and (c) a
combination of knowledge of performance and results with the goal-sett
ing method on the performance and learning of basketball skills of dif
ferent complexity. Three groups (n=26) of children followed the practi
ce methods and the performance (result), and technique of simple and c
omplex basketball skills (dribble, pass, shoot, and lay-up) were asses
sed for their effectiveness. Subjects practiced using four exercises f
or each skill, three times a week, for eight weeks. A performance and
a retention test (two weeks later) were conducted. A multivariate anal
ysis of variance with repeated measures on the last factor indicated t
hat knowledge of performance with results of goal-setting significantl
y improved the techniques of the more complex skills but it was signif
icantly better than the knowledge of results and goal-setting method f
or passing. Giving knowledge of results and setting goals improved per
formance and proved to be better than the knowledge of performance met
hod. Finally, the combined method was as good as the knowledge of perf
ormance and as good as the knowledge of results plus goal setting in p
erformance but improvement was delayed mostly for the more complex ski
lls. Attentional needs for the analysis of information given determine
d the success in skills execution and the effectiveness of the methods
. The different content of the information given to the athletes may i
mprove different aspects of motion or execution of the skills.