Ka. Al-rashood et al., Bioequivalence evaluation of norfloxacin 400 mg tablets (Uroxin (R) and Noroxin (R)) in healthy human volunteers, BIOPHARM DR, 21(5), 2000, pp. 175-179
A bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of 400 mg norfloxacin was c
arried out in 18 healthy volunteers according to a single dose, two-sequenc
e, cross-over randomized design at College of Pharmacy, King Saud Universit
y, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, jointly with King Khalid University Hospital. The
two formulations were: Uroxin(R) (Julphar, United Arab Emirates) as test an
d Noroxin(R) (Merck Sharpe & Dohme, BV, Netherlands). Both test and referen
ce formulations were administered to each subject after an overnight fastin
g on 2 treatment days separated. by 1 week wash-out period. After dosing, s
erial blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h. Plasma harvested f
rom blood, was analysed for norfloxacin by a sensitive, reproducible and ac
curate HPLC method. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t),
AUC(0-infinity), C-max, T-max, T-1/2, and K-el were determined from plasma
concentrations for both the formulations and found to be in good agreement
with reported values. AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and C-max were tested for
bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference
was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence interval for test/reference ratio
of these parameters were found within a bioequivalence acceptance range of
80-125%. Based on these statistical inferences, it was concluded that Uroxi
n(R) is bioequivalent to Noroxin". Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Lt
d.