R. Kaas et al., Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer, BR J SURG, 88(1), 2001, pp. 123-127
Background: Following treatment for primary breast cancer, annual mammograp
hy and regular clinical breast examination is advised. The aim of this stud
y was to investigate whether annual mammography resulted in an improvement
in stage of contralateral breast cancers compared with mammography performe
d at a longer interval.
Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients treated for breast c
ancer, who developed a contralateral breast cancer between 1977 and 1998. P
atients were stratified into two groups according to mammographic interval.
Results: Data were available for 275 patients who developed contralateral b
reast cancer during follow-up. Annual mammography was performed in 51 per c
ent; these patients were a mean of 5 years younger at diagnosis. Patients w
ho had annual or biennial mammography had comparable rates of impalpable co
ntralateral breast cancer, 30 and 27 per cent respectively. The tumours wer
e of favourable stages in 60 and 58 per cent respectively. Five-year diseas
e-free survival following diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer was 75 p
er cent in bath groups. When the contralateral lesion was detected by mammo
graphy, disease-free survival was better, irrespective of the stage of the
ipsilateral breast cancer.
Conclusion: No difference was found between the two groups in stage distrib
ution and disease-free survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast
cancer. Survival was better in patients in whom the contralateral breast c
ancer was first detected by mammography.