B. Fervers et al., Standards, Options and Recommendations (SOR): consequences of the SOR guidelines project in terms of liability for French Cancer Centers, B CANCER, 87(12), 2000, pp. 907-915
Context. The "Standards, Options and Recommendations" (SOR" project, starte
d in 1993, is a collaboration between the Federation of the French Cancer C
enters (FNCLCC), the 20 French comprehensive Cancer Centers and specialists
from French Public Universities, Genera Hospitals nad Private Clinics. The
main health care outcome for cancer patients. The methodology is based on
literature review and critical appraisal by a multidisciplinary group of ex
perts, with feedback from specialists in cancer care delivery. Objectives.
To identify consequences in terms of liability of the development of SOR gu
idelines and to formulate recommendations for the FNCLCC and medical doctor
s using SOR. Methods. Data have been identified by literatures search on le
gal matters by CNWH's Legal Center JuriSante, then submitted to a group of
8 experts. Results. The main conclusions of the present study are 1) The SO
R attest high level of quality and methodological rigor; 2) according to le
gal considerations and in comparison to the available scientific data, the
SOR guidelines can be considered as the state of the art in oncology at tim
e of release; 3) the study identified six quality properties of Standards,
Options and Recommendations (SOR): information contained in the SOR must be
serious, accurate reliable, complete, up-to-date and secure. The respect o
f these quality criteria is essential in the matter of liability; 4) when g
athered, they can prevent the actors from being implicated on questions of
liability. Specialists who use the SOR may avoid problems if liability, nev
ertheless evidence and the state of the art may evolve with time; 5) clinic
ians who do not use the SOR, may appear to be responsible for disasters, ex
cept if they can justify their medical decision (evolution of scientific kn
owledge or specific clinical circumstances, etc.); 6) therefore, SOR develo
pers need to keep in mind these essential properties when SOR are prepared;
7) the SOR steering committee (COSOR) analysed the conclusions of the pres
ent legal study and defined a series of actions and procedures to guarantee
the respect of the above quality criteria.