Much of the distribution range of Antarctic krill, Euphausia superba, is co
vered by permanent or seasonal sea ice. Sea ice extent has been implicated
as a major factor affecting reproductive success of krill and krill dispers
al, but little is known of the way in which ice cover may influence krill b
ehaviour. This is largely because the under-ice environment is difficult to
study. Ship-borne echosounders have, however, detected krill aggregations
in midwater in ice-covered regions. We used 120-kHz echograms collected und
erway during three cruises that crossed ice-covered and adjacent open water
s in the Bellingshausen, Weddell, and Scotia seas to compare morphological
and next-neighbour characteristics of krill swarms within and without ice c
over. No significant differences were detected between the horizontal and v
ertical extent of swarms or swarm next-neighbour distance in ice-covered or
open waters. Distributions of swarm mid-depths did, however, differ signif
icantly between ice-covered and open areas in all three seas, although the
direction of difference was not the same in each instance: swarms in the We
ddell and Scotia seas were generally shallower under ice than in open water
, whereas in the Bellingshausen Sea the opposite prevailed.