Background: A number of studies have documented variation in treatment patt
erns by treatment setting or by region. In order to better understand how t
reatment setting. might affect survival, we compared the survival outcomes
of women with node-negative breast cancer who were initially treated at tea
ching hospitals with those of women initially treated at community hospital
s.
Methods: We constructed a retrospective cohort consisting of a random sampl
e of 938 cases, initially diagnosed in 1991,drawn from the Ontario Cancer R
egistry. Exposure was defined by the type of hospital in which the initial
breast cancer surgery was performed. Outcomes were ascertained through foll
ow-up of vital statistics.
Results: The crude 5-year survival rate was 88.7% for women who had their i
nitial surgery in a community hospital and 92.5% for women who had their in
itial surgery in a teaching hospital. Women in higher income neighbourhoods
experienced better survival at 5 years regardless of which type of hospita
l they were treated in. Multivariate proportional hazards regression modell
ing demonstrated a 53% relative reduction in risk of death among women with
tumours less than or equal to 20 mm in diameter who were treated at a teac
hing hospital (relative risk [RR] = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23
-0.96), whereas among those with larger tumours there was no demonstrated d
ifference in survival (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 0.73-2.32). Other variables that w
ere significant in the model were age at diagnosis, estrogen receptor statu
s and the use of radiation therapy.
Interpretation: Women with node-negative breast cancer and tumours less tha
n or equal to 20 mm in diameter who were initially seen at a teaching hospi
tal had significantly better survival than women with similar tumours who w
ere initially seen at a community hospital. Survival among women with large
r tumours was not statistically significantly different for the 2 types of
hospital.