Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomyin patients with cleft lip and palate

Citation
A. Hirano et H. Suzuki, Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomyin patients with cleft lip and palate, CLEF PAL-CR, 38(1), 2001, pp. 1-10
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
10556656 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1 - 10
Database
ISI
SICI code
1055-6656(200101)38:1<1:FRTRAL>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Objective: To identify factors associated with relapse after maxillary adva ncement in cleft lip and palate patient. Subjects: Seventy-one cleft lip and palate patients underwent Le Fort I max illary advancement osteotomy between 1988 and 1998, and 58 patients (42 uni lateral cleft and 16 bilateral cleft) with complete data were investigated for relapse by clinical and cephalometric analysis, The clinical follow-up period ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 years (mean 2.5 years). Results: Horizontal advancement averaged 6.9 mm. There was a significant co rrelation between surgical movement and postoperative relapse in both the h orizontal and vertical planes, In vertical repositioning, 15 patients had m axillary intrusion and 31 had inferior repositioning. There was a significa nt difference between the intrusion group and the inferior repositioning gr oup. There was a significant correlation between surgical and postoperative rotation regardless of the direction. Other factors were evaluated by the horizontal relapse rate, Type of cleft and the rate of relapse were statist ically associated. A relapse was more likely to occur in patients with bila teral cleft. There were no significant associations with the rate of relaps e in type of operations or previous alveolar bone grafting. There was no si gnificant correlation between the rate of relapse and the number of missing anterior teeth, postoperative overbite and overjet, and age at operation. Four of 71 patients experienced major relapse, and 3 of them underwent jaw surgery again. Conclusions: Based on clinical and cephalometric analysis, two-jaw surgery should be performed in cases of severe maxillary hypoplasia, and overcorrec tion may be useful in inferior repositioning or surgical rotation. Special attention should be paid to the patient with bilateral cleft, multiple miss ing teeth, or shallow postoperative overbite.