J. Brunnee et Sj. Toope, International law and constructivism: Elements of an interactional theory of international law, COLUMB J TR, 39(1), 2000, pp. 19-74
By, linking the interactional legal theory of Lon L. Fuller to the insights
of recent constructivist literature in international relations (IR) theory
this article posits a distinctive explanation of the binding force of inte
rnational law and begins to trace out an explanation of law's persuasive po
wer in international society. The authors challenge the dominant positivist
explanations of law in international legal theory, and show how those expl
anations have been borrowed uncritically even by, many of those internation
al relations scholars who have paid particular attention to the role of nor
ms in world politics. Arguing that law is most pel suasive when it is creat
ed through processes of mutual construction by a wide range of participants
in a legal system, the authors focus upon a particular understanding of le
gal legitimacy rooted irt adherence to internal morality and the specificit
y of legal rationality a specificity generated in large measure by rhetoric
al processes. The article concludes with suggestions Sor a shared research
agenda for international lawyers and constructivist IR scholars.