Paper-and-pencil tests of perceptual/clerical speed have been used to selec
t clerical staff for decades, however clerical work in the modern office en
vironment involves the use of personal computers which did not exist when t
hese tests were originally developed. A need therefore exists to update the
established predictors of clerical work behaviors. One simple solution is
to computerize the traditional pencil-and-paper tests, and this option was
investigated in the current study in which a computerized perceptual/cleric
al speed test (canceling t's and e's) was compared to a paper-and-pencil fo
rm. Twenty different versions of the test were developed, varying type of t
ext, feedback and user friendliness. Results from 43 participants demonstra
ted the presence of a very strong common factor of speediness among all for
ms of the test in addition to a second factor capturing unique method varia
nce. Although closely related, the two forms were not equivalent. Type of t
ext and the presence of feedback was also found to affect performance. Impl
ications of these findings for the creation of new predictors of job perfor
mance will be discussed. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
.